|
The Quiet Third
The Holy Spirit and the Trinity Relationship
James Patrick Holding
A few years ago I composed the beginnings of my article on Jesus as God's Wisdom as a defense against Mormon views of the Trinity. Since then I have worked the article into a general defense of the Father-Son relationship against all comers. But what about the Holy Spirit? For a while now I have wanted to do a similar article on the third member of the Trinity, whom I have referred to as the "quiet third" because when compared to the Son and the Father, the Spirit seems a rather muted sort -- so much so that the danger, unlike with the Son, is not in removing the Spirit's deity, but rather his personality. I came to this project wondering if I would find, as I did in the case of Jesus and Wisdom, a Jewish conceptual category that fit the Holy Spirit. I did indeed -- and also discovered that where the Holy Spirit is concerned, Christianity took a radical departure from their Jewish forebears. This was indeed a fascinating study; and no surprise, it looks like yet again the skeptics and such are off the mark. But I will develop this essay further before I deign to address where others have gone wrong. My programmatic source for this essay is James D. G. Dunn's Christ and the Spirit, Vol. 2 on pneumatology. Dunn's first volume dealt with Christ and the second assumes knowledge of the first, as I here assume knowledge of my Wisdom essay linked above. The "shock" to our system is this: if the NT writers had followed their Jewish forebears regarding the Holy Spirit as they followed them on Wisdom, we would not today be Trinitarians but Binatarians, for "before the incarnation Logos and Spirit were hardly to be distinguished." [52] But let's begin not with the time between the Testaments, but with the OT itself, and with some commentary on the role and purpose of the Holy Spirit. We begin with these quotes from the OT:
This verse contributes our first glimpse for understanding: The word "spirit" is the Hebrew ruwach, and it is the usual word for any spirit, human or divine, but it is also the word used for wind (Genesis 8:1 God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters asswaged...) The clue we gather here is that "spirit" is a moving and active thing -- not stagnant. We will see the application of this later on.
Here the Spirit of God is tied directly to the possession of wisdom and knowledge. (See also Ex. 35:31) We can already sense that there will be a close relationship between Wisdom and the Spirit. But the Spirit is responsible for other types of insight as well:
The Spirit of God is also tied in with prophecy. The alert reader will anticipate that this carries over into NT times as well. (See also 1 Sam. 10:10, 2 Chr. 24:20, Ezek. 11:24) But we will also see that there is a synonym for the Spirit in the context of prophectic activity:
The imagery of God's "hand" is found in these passages associated with prophecy; but it is also found in other contexts which give us further insight:
These are examples of places where "hand" is used to refer to activity or action as a whole, as it is in these examples:
The hand signifies action and power. The "hand of God" signifies God's action and power. This lays the foundation for an understanding of the Holy Spirit as God's action principle in the world (which acts in accordance with God's Word, or instruction). There is a final set of quotes we need to look at:
The "spirit of the Lord" is another synonym for the divine principle that inspires prophecy and inspires action. We are now ready to look at what commentary is available from between the Testaments. As noted, and in accordance with the first Exodus quote above, there appears to have been no distinction made between God's Wisdom and God's Spirit:
As Dunn notes, Wisdom/Logos and Spirit overlap. This is also found in Philo (De plantatione 18). Our study now moves to the NT evidence, and it is here where we encounter our key issue of diversion from Christianity's Judaistic roots. Christianity developed a "bifurcation" between the Wisdom and the Spirit that was not paralleled in Judaism; and yet, we also see that a close relationship remains between the two. But let's work through the NT and see how the "Holy Ghost" (as it reads in the KJV) parallels the role of the Spirit or hand of God in the OT.
Here the Holy Spirit is associated with God's actions -- in judgment and cleansing, in creative power. (Note especially the parallel to Is. 40:7.)
Here the Holy Spirit is associated with prophetic inspiration, and with knowledge imparted by God. As we move into the post-resurrection church, these roles paralleling the OT continue -- and we also see a tight relationship between Word and Spirit:
Here Peter has explicitly connected the Holy Spirit with the prophetic and eschatological spirit reported in Joel. But now see an example of the "tight relationship":
Compare this to the Exodus cite above.
Compare this to OT passages above from Judges.
The Holy Spirit is identified with the Spirit of God in the OT that inspired prophecy.
The Spirit here offers an "experiential identification" [Dunn, 79] with Christ for the believer. Through the Spirit, the believer experiences Christ; yet they are still distinct. Another relevant contribution:
Here the "Spirit of God" and "Spirit of Christ" are synonymous. Now another "role" verse for the Spirit:
The Spirit is a washer, a justifier, a sanctifier. It is God's principle of action, and "the medium by which Christ is known to and united with his followers." [Dunn, 337] So it is clear by now that the NT teaches an equation of the Holy Spirit with the Spirit, or hand, of the Lord/God in the OT. This emerges quite clearly in these parallel verses:
Luke here is clearly influenced by the passage in Exodus in which the magicians of Pharaoh, defeated, attribute miraculous power to the "finger of God." But we can also see a relationship overall to passages speaking of the "hand" of God. Furthermore, note that the presence of the kingdom of God is determined in terms of the "effective power of the Spirit" [Dunn, 6]. In essence, the Spirit's presence signifies the presence of God's ruling power. The divinity of the Holy Spirit is not in question based on the Scriptures. It is also clear from the Wisdom connection that the Spirit is in relation to God in a thoroughly Trinitarian sense -- it is not a separate being, but like Wisdom, proceeds from God. (There is some discussion over exactly how this procession works, but that is an issue we will leave aside for the present.) There remains one question: can it be shown that the Holy Spirit is a person as Jesus the Word was? Is it justified to see the Spirit as a "distinct center of conscious thought" as the creedal statements affirm? At first glance, it may be easy to object that with no incarnation of the Spirit, there is no direct evidence of the Spirit as a person. The Spirit could just be a "force with you" and impersonal, an effect of God. Why not be a Binitarian? There are no statements, as from Jesus, where the Spirit prays to the Father. Or are there?
If the Spirit is not a separate person, how does he intercede? But here is the classic text for the personhood of the Spirit:
Is it possible to lie to or test, to disobey or to grieve, an impersonal force? (See also Acts 16:16, Eph. 4:30) Or:
Luke and Darth's "Force" didn't have anything to say, but the Spirit does, and even uses personal pronouns (Acts 13:2). Pushback: The Bible has trees speaking [Ps. 96:11-12; Is. 55:12], and hands and feet speaking [1 Cor. 12:15-16]. It also has names rotting [Prov. 10:7], land vomiting [Lev. 18:25] and blood crying out [Gen. 4:10]. So what if the Spirit speaks also? This objection doesn't make the grade: These passages are clearly in poetic/allegorical genres, whereas the above verses are straight narrative discourse; furthermore, verses where land vomits or blood cries is also clearly allegorical, since land and blood have no mouth, but a spirit is a living and active force and has a means to speak. At the same time, neither land nor blood ever has such a wide variety of active and interpersonal-relation verbs applied to them. Blood cries out, but no one has ever "lied" to blood or had it intercede for them in prayer. The Spirit is indeed the quiet member of the Trinity in terms of the reports we have; he was not incarnated among men and converses with them even now only inwardly. But he clearly does speak, and that's not what an impersonal force does. Pushback: 1 Tim. 2:5 says, For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. If the Holy Spirit were a person co-equal with the Father and Son it would be an affront to exclude him from some intermediary position. This objection simply doesn't grasp the meaning of the term "mediator". It was originally a business term, broadened to mean any mediator. The word is used by Paul elsewhere to refer to Moses (Gal. 3:19) and in Hebrews 1:6: "But now hath [Jesus] obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises." (See also 9:15, 12:24) The word refers to a specific function of administration, not merely a go-between. The Spirit did not and does not serve this function. Pushback: The word "spirit" is neuter in gender. How can an "it" be a person? John's Gospel twice refers to the Holy Spirit in a masculine gender: 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me: John 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will show you things to come. Helpfully the last passage also clarifies the nature of the relationship of the Spirit to the Father; the Spirit "proceeds" as Wisdom does. Pushback: But other objects are assigned gender in the Bible. Even today we refer to objects like ships in the feminine! Those who offer this objection -- which I have found -- fail to provide examples of objects in the Bible being assigned gender. The idea about ships has no bearing unless one provides evidence that a "spirit" was referred to thusly even without any notion of personality. Finally, there are Trinitarian formula which place the Spirit on a par with Father and Son (Matt. 28:19, 2 Cor. 13:14). Some may object that there is nothing that says that the Spirit is a person in these passages, but it is the burden of proof upon the replier to show that personality is not part of the Spirit's makeup. The Christian Counter |